No long form posts this time just a bit of reality.
The wider web is just waking up to the fact that with the
impending launch of Windows 10 things are going to be a bit different.
The most obvious, of course, is that for most people the
"upgrade" will be free unless you happen to be an enterprise
customer.
What IT pros have known for a couple of months now is that
Microsoft's definition of "Free" as it pertains to Windows 10 is less
like "Free Beer" and more like "Free vacation" as in those
awful timeshare sales pitch weekends.
As an IT pro I'll tolerate a lot of things if nobody's in my
wallet but I'm always mindful that somewhere down the line there will be a
price exacted.
And so it is with Windows 10...
I'll cut to the quick.
The most important thing to know about Windows 10 is that it's more than
a better Windows 8. It's the cornerstone
of a sales platform which is why they can afford to give it away.
Which is also why things like mandatory updates are in your
future. Like it or not if Microsoft
wants to change something you have nothing to say about it.
That's problematic because the Redmond guys don't have the
greatest track record with updates. Any
IT pro can probably think of at least half a dozen that ruined their day.
It's also wise to be suspicious of motives when a company hides
its true intentions in seemingly innocuous descriptions like " an update
to the update. " (KB3035583)
As such you'd be well advised to treat the new OS like one
of those Internet Kiosks you used to find in the airports. In short, it's an access point but it's not
personal.
So what does all of this really mean?
Windows 10 is the first real version of Windows to enforce a
EULA that's been around since Windows 3.1.
I.E. Wake up kiddies, you don't own the software and for whatever ills
Windows 10 may cure you're essentially granting them root access.
There are changes under the hood that go beyond a fresh interface to include updates, licensing and authentication. Things you may not see but nonetheless should be aware of.
It's simple, Microsoft is interested in building a tightly walled garden much like Apple but without the huge investments in hardware.
It's simple, Microsoft is interested in building a tightly walled garden much like Apple but without the huge investments in hardware.
It makes sense. Why
reinvent the wheel when there's so many willing and eager to do it for you?
If you're ok passing everything through Microsoft's sanity
filter then this probably isn't a problem for you and 90% of users will gladly
give up a little more control for a free copy of a "Windows" OS.
However, If you're at all interested in security and privacy
then I'd start interviewing Linux distros and secure offline storage. I'd also be wary of any project that embraces
MS recent change of heart about open source.
Nothing's free and to be fair they have a right to control
their OS but you have a right to be in exclusive control of your data.
I know, it sounds like we're venturing into the realm of conspiracy
theory but stop for a moment and think about just how much of your life lies
within those bits.
Of course if you have nothing to hide then you don't have a
problem right?
Yes, yes we do...
No comments:
Post a Comment